What there is instead is declared and undeclared biases/slants.

TC makes his bias/slant very clear. If you disagree, fine. But don’t ask him to present a “fair” account, when all that “fair” means is “I agree with some of it.”

And as for his obvious agenda–it seems fairly obvious to me that his/her/their agenda involves pointing out the hypocrisy, inpetitude and corruption of the Thai establishment. Given that, how on earth can he be doing his agenda a “disservice” by “presenting a narrow view on most topics”?

But maybe that’s just me.

“Gasoline up sales during the week-end = it shows that people are sabai.”

Here is the fraud, here is the vast nonsense.

Now, your obsession with “balance” is rather amusing. Who told you I was “balanced” ?

I am opinionated.

I don’t like when politicians are talking bullshit. I don’t like when people are eating this bullshit with a smile.

And in this field, there is no “balance”.

At first I thought I could learn something from your blog but you do yourself and your obvious agenda a disservice by presenting a narrow view on most topics. Somewhat similar to a UK or US tabloid yet masquerading as an informed, balanced commentary (whilst appealing to the lowest common-denominator).

Objectivity and balance in presentation may do your blog a world of good (although this doesn’t appear to be the desired agenda). Just my humble opinion, no offense.

Can’t be, he’s just a myth made up to scare children and Economists…